Ariel (Prolotario1):
One Thing That Comes To Mind: A Motive In The Making?
Do you all remember a voter protesting giving data over to the DOJ over privacy concerns?
Let’s Look At The Timeline
Early August 2025: The DOJ requested voter registration data from South Carolina as part of a multi-state effort.
September 2025: A Calhoun County voter, Anne Crook, sued to block the data release, citing the state constitution’s right to privacy. A state judge issued a temporary restraining order in her favor.
Mid-September 2025: The South Carolina Supreme Court removed the temporary restraining order on procedural grounds, allowing the data release to proceed while the lawsuit continued.
Late September 2025: A state circuit court heard arguments on whether to grant a temporary injunction to halt the transfer.
October 1, 2025: Circuit Judge Daniel Coble denied the request for a temporary injunction, citing the need for state agencies to cooperate with federal requests and noting that the State Election Commission had already committed to not releasing data without a signed agreement that included privacy safeguards.
The lawsuit is still pending, the denial of the injunction means there is no current court order preventing the transfer of voter data to the DOJ.
So the question must be asked here. Did she allow or cooperate with giving this data over? Because if so I can understand why this would have someone extreme nervous to either retaliate.
The requested information includes:
• Full names
• Date of births
• Residential addresses
• State driver’s license numbers or the last four digits of social security numbers
I am just brainstorming here. Because the implications here carry some hefty criminal charges if some illegal immigration or dead relatives have been voting if you get my drift.
BREAKING: South Carolina Judge Diane Goodstein’s home is burning to the ground after an apparent explosion.
— Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) October 5, 2025
Source(s):
https://x.com/Prolotario1/status/1974984286164959368
